Any number of situations may arise which
may lead an AKYLADE tester or non-tester to file a formal complaint with the
AKYLADE. This may include a complaint
regarding a perceived flaw in a question or exam process, or a complaint
against an AKYLADE certified individual, staff member, volunteer, or proctor.
Additionally, the complaint process will be followed when a candidate appeals
the decision on the issue of the certification being awarded or not. Therefore,
for the sake of policy and procedure the “Appeals” process will be synonymous
with the “Complaint” process.
This process offers any individual the
opportunity to have his, her, or their concerns heard in a fair, objective
forum. However, individuals will not be entitled to receive a copy of either the
certification examination or the answers to any questions on the
examination.
Such individuals may present written
evidence of the basis for their complaint. Such evidence shall be reviewed, and
appropriate action taken. No
disciplinary action will be taken against the individual simply because
he/she/they have/have filed a complaint.
All complaints will be treated as confidential.
To ensure an impartial appeals process, a
Complaint (Appeals) Review Panel (hereinafter “Review Panel” consisting of
three (3) AKYLADE Advisory Council members is formed: The Chairperson and two
other voting members. The Chairperson of the Review Panel will be the AKYLADE
Advisory Council Chairperson, who will appoint the other two voting members
from the existing AKYLADE Advisory Council. If the Chairperson chooses a
Complaint Review Panel member who has a personal or financial conflict of
interest, that Review Panel member will be withdrawn from the Review Panel. If
the Chairperson is the subject of the complaint, then the Chief Executive
Officer of AKYLADE will assume the lead role in this process.
The Review Panel reviews each case
individually and then processes the results of the review directly with the
individual filing the complaint. The AKYLADE Advisory Council grants the Review
Panel full and final authority to institute corrective action, if any is
required.
The Review Panel Chairperson will chair all
meetings of the Review Panel, which will be held, as needed, by conference call
unless an in-person review is requested and paid for by the complainant. Dates
and times for review will be determined by the Review Panel Chairperson.
Panel members and the complainant will be
informed of the date at least one (1) month prior to the conference call. All materials available for the review
will be provided in writing to the members in advance of the review.
Under no circumstances will an appeal or
complaint result in discriminatory actions against the appellant.
If the appeal for certification is found to
be valid and therefore certification is granted; the issue that triggered the
appeal will be reviewed and changed immediately.
If AKYLADE finds a substantiated complaint
about an AKYLADE certified person, that person will be contacted for comment.
If they do not reply within 30 days or if comments/evidence do not fully
justify behaviors the “certification withdrawal” process will begin.
All complaint handling processes will
comply with AKYLADE’s privacy policy.
Procedure: